This week, let's take a look at the rank correlations between the teams' competition ladder positions (based on the methodology used here on MoS, which uses competition points as a proportion of maximum possible points, then percentage) and their ordering on the various Team Dashboard metrics.

The latest Team Dashboard is lurking, as is its wont, below, and this week we'll be looking once again at the MoS Win Production Function and the difference between teams' actual win percentages and the percentages their scoring statistics suggest might be expected.

Time to once again compare each team's ranking on Dashboard metrics to their competition ladder positions:

The latest Team Dashboard appears below and this week I'll confine the analysis to a handful of observations:

The latest Team Dashboard is lurking, as is its wont, below, and this week we'll be looking once again at the MoS Win Production Function and the difference between teams' actual win percentages and the percentages their scoring statistics suggest might be expected.

Time to once again compare each team's ranking on Dashboard metrics to their competition ladder positions:

The latest Team Dashboard is below, and this week we'll take another look at the MoS Win Production Function and what it says about teams' actual winning percentages versus what might be expected based on their scoring statistics.

The latest Team Dashboard appears below.

This week, let's take a look at the rank correlations between the teams' competition ladder positions (based on the methodology used here on MoS, which uses competition points as a proportion of maximum possible points, then percentage) and their ordering on the various Team Dashboard metrics.

Time to once again compare each team's ranking on Dashboard metrics to their competition ladder positions.

The latest Team Dashboard appears below. It contains the latest estimates from the MoS Win Production Function,

The latest Team Dashboard appears below, which I order during the bye rounds firstly on the basis of competition points gained per game played. This week that sees the Gold Coast occupying 12th place rather than the 15th place that a traditional treatment would imply.

The latest Team Dashboard appears below.

Last week I provided a lot of commentary on the Team Dashboard, so this week I'll restrict myself to a quick update on the thoughts of the MoS Win Production Function (MWPF).

At six rounds into the season, it's a reasonable time to compare each team's ranking on Dashboard metrics to their competition ladder positions.

The latest Team Dashboard appears below. One striking feature of the details in the Dashboard is the contrasting fate of the Dockers and the Roos despite the generally better scoring statistics of the latter.

The latest Team Dashboard reveals, among other things, that:

There's a pleasing symmetry to the competition ladder now, with three teams on three wins, six on two wins, six on one win, and three on zero wins.

It's still way too early to be performing any meaningful analysis of the data in the Team Dashboard, so I'll allow myself just a few parenthetic comments:

For readers new to MoS, let me introduce the Team Dashboard. Updated at the end of every round, the Dashboard has three main sections.